|
Chris
Costello
Donna Laquidara
ENG 4102Critical Writing Workshop
12/5/00
The
Impact of Poor Environmental Design
on the Human Psyche (page 2)
What
is the Problem?
Over the past fifty years, Americas man-made landscape
has been transformed into a haphazard array of repulsive and
alarming geometric forms and color combinations that shock
the senses. The gargantuan office structures, super highway
interchanges, and piles of box like buildings strewn across
the nation make every town seem like the one next to it. Connected
by asphalt and telephone wires, they are boring, repetitive,
sometimes horrifying, but never forgettable because they are
permanent scars on the landscape and in our minds. These bland
structures and spaces that we are forced to look at and interact
with on a daily basis are having a profound negative impact
on our minds. Yet, it is the publics current acceptance
of irresponsible development and economic practices that is
part of the problem. Since the proliferation of the mid-twentieth
century ideas of progress and the manifestation
of the American Dream, many have turned a blind
eye to poor urban design and its repercussions as they pursued
the promises of technology and convenience that the new and
modern society will provide. The concepts of suburbia
and expressways , for example, were essentially
untried experiments operated at a very large scale that promised
quick personal transportation and easy living. Years later,
we now live with the resultsabandoned city centers,
shifting demographics, and overloaded highways, along with
a few unforeseen social side affects such as murder and suicides
among suburban teens along with a new a phenomenon known as
road rage.
The
proponents of post-World War II urban development trends have
recommended the sweeping away of old architecture in favor
of more modern and functional structures. For
example, during the urban renewal projects of
the 1960s, entire city neighborhoods throughout America
were completely demolished and replaced with high rise housing
projects. Designed in an architectural style sometimes referred
to as Modernism, they amounted to nothing more than towering
cement boxes devoid of color and human character. These structures
were capable of housing hundreds of tenants per square block,
but in the inner city neighborhoods, they become
breeding grounds for the despair and discontent that lead
many of its occupants to turn to gang activity and crime.
These developments, however provided sizable profits for commercial
developers, politicians and retailers, so the practice continued.
Today, even the residential real estate industry benefits
from this practice as new constructions become commodities
rather than homes. However, we all pay the price in an overall
dearth of lovable places and community peace of mind.
It
is unfortunate that we have lost concern for beauty and community
purpose in our environment today. It seems that statements
of glory, achievement and civic pride are characteristics
of societies long forgotten by most. The European Renaissance,
for example, was a time of creative rebirth and a renewal
of passion as artists, architects, scientists and writers
reflected this newly discovered spirit in their cities. The
Italian city of Florence, home to Michelangelo and Leonardo
da Vinci, was such a society. In the late 1400s, the
builders of this magnificent place thoughtfully planned its
growth from a commune to a national center of commerce and
culture. As Renaissance thinkers, civic beauty was foremost
in their minds. Note how the writer Henri Marie Beyel describes
his first visit there:
the
tide of emotion was as intense as a religious feeling. My
soul
was in a state of trance. Absorbed in the contemplation
of sublime beauty, I could perceive its very essence close
at hand.
I had reached that most high degree of sensitivity
in which the divine intimations of art merge with the sensuality
of emotion.
I was seized by a fierce palpitation of
the heart. I walked on fearing that I might fall to the
ground (qtd. in Labella 23).
The
esthetic nature of the city had a very positive impact on
his psyche. It is interesting to wonder how he might have
described his first visit to Los Angeles, California. Sadly,
in America today, architectural beauty is overshadowed by
greed as developers stress functionality and economy. The
main purpose for housing developments and high rise office
buildings is to occupy them with as many tenants as possible
at the least possible expense. Shopping malls, convenience
stores, and retail centers serve only to attract customers,
sell products and make money. To facilitate such development,
architects use the simplest, most cost effective geometric
form to construct withthe square. Thus, we have an environment
cluttered with stark cubic structures that inspire neither
praise nor admiration.
I
argue that the overuse of such design motifs have a subtle
negative affect on the human spirit. Consider the Swastika.
The notorious symbol of Nazi Germany; this jarring, angular
geometric form conjures up disturbing memories and emotions
that people living in the later part of the 20th century cannot
ignore. Adolf Hitler borrowed the symbol from Native American
culture and transformed it into the hallmark of such Nazi
ideals as Aryan superiority, military conquest and genocide.
More recently, it has been used by extremists to symbolize
racism and hatred. Because of these associations, the symbol
has been forever maligned to represent the purest form of
evil and moral depravity. The bold, dark strokes and sharp
angles themselves are very alarming and, combined with the
meaning of the symbol, are very disturbing to behold. It undeniably
wells up feelings of embarrassment, shame, and disgust. Yet
many of the buildings we see every day use these same design
motifsharsh, rigid angles that are even further enhanced
by dark shadows that are cast by the sun. These forms, when
repeated and amplified, can create the same sense of alarm
and despair. We can feel hopelessly oppressed by these ugly
and overwhelming structures in our cities and it is no wonder
that many of us wish to escape to a more beautiful
and enriching space.
There
are three places that have had the greatest influenced on
my life, and have made me quite aware of how we can be so
affected by our surroundings. I grew up in Kingston, New York,
a very historic town on the Hudson River at the foot of the
Catskill Mountains. With the exception of the stereotypical
malls and suburbs common to most American towns, it is a beautiful
place, with Gothic church buildings, Victorian mansions, an
authentic turn of the century main street and charming stone
buildings dating back to the 1600s. Being a small city,
one does not have to travel far to find sprawling farms, meadows,
lakes and forests. The surrounding Hudson Valley was home
to the Vanderbilts, the Roosevelts and others of the American
elite who built their mansions and summer retreats on the
banks of the magnificent Hudson River. Today, it is home to
many New York City commuters who find the two-hour commute
a small price to pay for living in such wonderful surroundings.
It is a beautiful place and I did not realize how much it
affected me until I moved to attend art school in Fort Lauderdale,
Florida.
In
contrast, with the exception of its beautiful beaches and
isolated parks, Fort Lauderdale is a very ugly place. Incorporated
in 1911, it is a relatively new city that saw much of its
growth start after the First World War. Its population swelled
in the 1950s as a popular resort area and much of the
citys architectural makeup is of the drab Modernist
style. With cheap and abundant land available, the citys
grid, even to this day, is expanding ever west with construction
of thousands of hastily built suburban housing complexes and
endless miles of anonymous boulevards. I seemed to be lost
in a constant state of shock as I found myself continually
looking for someplace that did not seem alien
a place
were I could rest my mind. As an artist, I deeply desired
to connect with something wonderful and sensual, but these
surroundings denied me. I was often depressed and longed to
be return to the tranquility of the Hudson Valley. I could
not imagine settling in a faceless South Florida suburb for
any period of time and constantly felt a need to vacate
or leave my present surroundings. I then discovered other
places in the area, like Key Biscayne, Key West, and Coconut
Grove which were oasises of culture and emotional renewal
that made my time in South Florida bearable.
I
am not alone with these feelings. James Howard Kunstler, in
his book The Geography of Nowhere asks: Why did America
build a reality of terrible places from which people longed
to escape? (106). Why do we need vacations, anyway?
Part of the reason is that we desire to leave behind our mundane
and depressing surroundings in search for some place better;
a beautiful place to relax and recreate. If you could afford
to stay and live somewhere like Marthas Vineyard, Key
West, or Aspen, would you really want to leave as often? With
a continual sense of dissatisfaction, I found the need to
leave Fort Lauderdale all too often and finally did so for
good.
After
making my home in Boston, Massachusetts, my work as a musician
gave me several opportunities to stay in Paris, France. My
first experience with this city was profound and lasting.
I was in awestruck by the beauty of its buildings and public
squares. This ancient man-made environment was stunning; full
of vitality and people that were interacting and enjoying
the fact that they were there. I had never seen or felt anything
like this in all my life. It was a place where I wanted to
be because everything about it was so inspiring. Dr. Salingaros
described his first visit there as not only visual and
psychologicalit was physical, and a shock to my body
it
is one emotional experience that I can recall very vividly.
I had no idea that materials and space could have such a positive
affect on a person (Ecology). Shouldnt
all cities move people in this same way? Boston, at the turn
of the century, looked a lot like Paris, in all of its romantic
splendor, but much of it was laid waste under the urban renewal
projects of the 1950s and 1960s (Kay, 298). While
the French chose to preserve the character of central Paris
and developed a modern urban center outside of the old city,
La Defénse, for example, Americans demolished their
old cities and built new ones on top of the ruins. This is
evidence of two cultures that honor opposing value systems.
While the Parisians enjoy a sip of wine at a romantic café
overlooking the picturesque Ile de la Cite Conciergerie during
a two hour lunch break, Bostonians skip lunch to work extra
hours inside their brand new office cube so they can make
more money to afford payments for the car that rushes them
out of the city every night to their private little space
in the burbs, always tired and never satisfied.
This is not a life, it is simply an existence. I believe we
must stop and think about what our artificial surroundings
are doing to us.
1 2 3 4 5 Sources
©2007
Chris Costello. All rights reserved.
|